You can vote and/or suggest a fight only if you have performed at least 50 mainspace edits; otherwise, your votes and/or suggestions will be removed. To check your edit count, click here and enter your username.
You must be active for at least one week before you can vote and/or suggest.
No suggesting fights for other users
No more than eight suggestions per week
1 support column
Signed-in users only
If a character fought recently, don't suggest him/her in a fight for at least two weeks (see list of previous fights).
No talk templates
Sign your suggestions/votes/comments with ~~~~.
Don't vote for your own suggestion; you automatically vote for it if you suggest it.
Two lovelorn characters who use Link to communicate with the objects of their affection. They ask him to mail letters for them, but their attempts at starting relationships are doomed. ~~SirReal
Support: Why not. ~Minish(talk) 22:53, September 9, 2012 (UTC)
Support: Payment in thirteen and a half crates of crystalline gilveronze likenesses of early-season Fonzie as per our agreement, right? Skype nepotism is the new wave! --AuronKaizer! 22:57, September 9, 2012 (UTC)
Oppose: One has to ask Link to deliver the letter because it is a forbidden love where the other has to because he can't man up. There are other characters that have Link deliver love letters so why not Cawlin vs. Sweetie if that is the connection. I just don't like the connection used I guess. --Birdman5589 (talk) 23:02, September 9, 2012 (UTC)
Comment: Never even heard of Sweetie until now. Never got a chance to play FSA. Besides, the other candidates were Kafei or Anju, both of whom would unbalance the fight dramatically, or Mr. Write. ~~SirReal
Oppose: Poor. – Jazzi (talk) 23:16, September 9, 2012 (UTC)
Neutral: I actually do kind of like the concept, but the part that kills it for me is that neither character is particularly good and therefore neither is at all worth voting for. XykebYvolixZraliv 00:27, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
Neutral: It's ok, but ya know what Xykeb said. GreenRupee 02:15, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
Neutral: It's alright, but as others said, there are more options that fit this description. --EveryDayJoe45 (talk) 16:32, September 15, 2012 (UTC)