1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12
- This section is subject to change.
- You can vote and/or suggest a fight only if you have performed at least 50 mainspace edits; otherwise, your votes and/or suggestions will be removed. To check your edit count, click here and enter your username.
- You must be active for at least one week before you can vote and/or suggest.
- No suggesting fights for other users
- No more than eight suggestions per week
- 1 support column
- Signed-in users only
- If a character fought recently, don't suggest him/her in a fight for at least two weeks (see list of previous fights).
- No talk templates
- Sign your suggestions/votes/comments with ~~~~.
- Don't vote for your own suggestion; you automatically vote for it if you suggest it.
- No duplicate fights (unless it hasn't happened in more than a year. See list of previous fights).
- All fight suggestions will be archived after a new fight is selected.
- A user can suggest only one fight per week (for example, you may not suggest 3 fights at one time)
- Don't suggest the same fight 2 weeks in a row.
- Add the battle participants in alphabetical order.
- Post your suggestion at the bottom of the page.
- Post WHY you support/oppose.
- You can remove your own suggestion, but you may not post a new suggestion until next week.
Specifically the Magic Armor from The Wind Waker, both are items that eliminate damage taken, surround Link with an aura, and are completely optional. Also, they have a very similar shape. Green Rupee 21:36, February 20, 2017 (UTC)
- Support: I really like this one. Item matches were always pretty rare, and this is a unique one. Count me in. —Ceiling Master 22:01, February 20, 2017 (UTC)
- Support: This one seems kind of obvious. Surprised we never had it before. Oni Dark Link 01:54, February 21, 2017 (UTC)
- Support: Agreed. WiseAdventurer (talk) 16:14, February 24, 2017 (UTC)
- Support: I like it. Green Rupee 07:50, February 21, 2017 (UTC)
- Support: I think it's a great idea to start incorporating Hyrule Warriors stuff into the ToC. If it's here on the Wiki, we may as well use it. —Ceiling Master 12:26, February 21, 2017 (UTC)
- Support: (Rubeus) Agreed. WiseAdventurer (talk) 16:14, February 24, 2017 (UTC)
So we might see a flood of new users interested in the Temple of Courage thanks to the discussion board and Breath of the Wild's release. But too ensure that this stays active until such a time that we have a lot of users, I suggest we dispatch with the weekly voting format and make it more que based. So basically suggestions need a certain amount of supports to get in and then are added to the que. This will ensure we have enough content to actually keep the thing running without people having to actively go back and repost their old suggestions (which you can't actually do consecutively via the only rules). I think the Temple of Courage is a fantastic way of getting people invested in the wiki. I know it's how I first ended up joining. So I think it'd be a shame if this revival fails to actually stick around. Especially with the new traffic we can be expected to see. Thoughts? Oni Dark Link 12:37, February 21, 2017 (UTC)
- I'm fine with passing things that don't get opposed or have a notable amount of support. We can largely keep the process the same and add the suggestions that pass to this list. Green Rupee 22:15, February 21, 2017 (UTC)
I'd really feel a lot more comfortable with a +3 minimum but the fact remains that the current suggestions only have two votes each and I'm not confident in the chances that's going to change anytime soon. So I say we'll start off with +2 but let's try to up it as soon as we can. Oni Dark Link 16:09, February 24, 2017 (UTC)
- Ha, that's exactly what I was thinking. I'm really hoping for more users and we'll definitely change it when that happens, to at least +3. Eventually I hope we can work it back up to whatever the original was. +5? +8? I can't even remember anymore. —Ceiling Master 16:19, February 24, 2017 (UTC)
- I don't think there was a specific limit. Since there was no que and just one winner each week it was just whoever had the most votes. Sometimes there were ties but generally there was enough users with varying opinions that someone stepped forward to break it (that actually caused some minor drama every now and then. I remember EverydayJoe got really pissed at me for a while after I swapped a neutral vote to an oppose on one of his suggestions. He would then consistently oppose my suggestions regardless for the weeks afterwards. Was surprisingly childish for a guy who usually acted so mature. Ah, those were the days).