This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current talk page.

Contents 1 Triforce 14 (administrator) 1.1 Votes 2 Bek The Conqueror (administrator) 2.1 Votes 3 EveryDayJoe45 (administrator) 3.1 Votes 4 Oni Dark Link (rollback) 4.1 Votes 5 Hero Of Wisdom (administrator, remove all rights) 5.1 Votes 6 Lord link (b'crat, remove all rights) 6.1 Votes 7 Hero of Time 87 (b'crat, remove b'crat rights only) 7.1 Votes 8 Baltro (rollback) 8.1 Votes 8.2 Comments 9 Darknut15 (rollback) 9.1 Votes 10 Ccbermanzzpedia (Rollback) 10.1 Votes 11 TheNewSheik (For Rollback Nomination) 11.1 Votes 12 Baltro (administrator) 12.1 Votes 13 Ccbermanzzpedia (administrator) 13.1 Votes 14 Jedimasterlink (rollback) 14.1 Votes 15 Zelda311 (rollback) 15.1 Votes 16 MaloMart (rollback) 16.1 Votes

Triforce 14 (administrator) Edit

The result of the discussion was: Support

Triforce 14 (talk · contributions · edit count)

Well, I've been around for about four to five months now (although I haven't been able to be on as much in the last month due to school and such), and I think I've made some pretty good contributions. As you may have noticed, there are quite a few admins already; however, very few (about 2-3) are actually active. I'm essentially running for the same reasons listed here. Anyway, I'm helpful and usually fairly kind towards other users. If you would like some examples of my major contributions, click here.

Votes Edit

Support: Arr! Ye are in truth one of the best users ZP has ever seen. Dedication, Wiki know-how and all that stuff. There couldn't be a better fit for adminship out there. Umm, somewhere along the way I forgot my pirate accent! Arr! Ye be drinking grog with us admins when ye pass! --AuronKaizer! 09:08, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Neutral: I REALLY want to say support for this application, and I fully intend to eventually. However, we've had some users (Moblin Slayer for example) who've been on the wiki for nearing a year and we still haven't fully dealt with their applications either for the reason I'm saying wait here. Once you've reached at least the six-month mark, I think we could overlook the time-gap, but there needs to be a uniform standard applied to everyone who's applying for adminship. I do intend to change my vote to support once that amount of time has passed though because you've been a great editor for the wiki and I agree 100% with all that you said in your application. We just need to make sure we're not applying different standards to different applicants. Just a little bit longer (a month at most if you've been on for five already) and I will gladly change my vote to support. Hero of Time 87 14:27, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Comment: Not to argue with you or anything, but shouldn't this be based on what I've done rather than other people's applications? I understand your position, but if their current applications are causing the problem, shouldn't a decision be made on a stalled request after a certain amount of time? For example, say after a month or two of inconclusive voting, a request could be considered opposed? Just a thought.—Triforce 14^(...) 17:11, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Comment: That's beside the point. Adminship is based on both what you've done as well as depending a bit on how long you've been here. The only reason I'm saying wait is b/c I've told others before that they needed a little more time as well and it wouldn't seem right to tell one person that and not everyone else. I don't want it to seem like favorites are being played here. I fully support your bid, you could even consider my vote a "support" in waiting. But I still stand by my decision just so things are fair. But in a few weeks when you've surpassed a six-month anniversary of joining, then I will certainly change my vote to support. I would do it now, but I don't want it to seem like it's unfair to those who I've told this before. Hero of Time 87 20:40, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Comment: Alright, I understand. —Triforce 14^(...) 21:38, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Comment: Please don't think this is anything about you though Triforce. I really do support your bid for adminship and in my view you deserve it, hence why I said you will definitely have a "support" vote from me, eventually. I just don't want some of the earlier applicants who had similar credentials to think they got a raw deal. You are correct, some of those applications need to be dealt with, but that's the only reason I've made my current vote a "wait." But I do want you to know I fully support your bid and will eventually change my vote to support b/c I've seen a great many useful edits from you and you've been very devoted to the wiki. You will make a great addition to the roll call of admins for ZP. In fact, why don't we say May 1st to be the day I do intend to make my vote a full support. That is about two to three weeks, and by that time you will have six months in, and nobody can say we did not check time on the wiki then. So May 1st I will make my vote a full support Triforce, that I promise. Hero of Time 87 22:34, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Comment: I know you don't have anything against me. I was just saying I understand why you voted the way you did. No hard feelings or nothin' :P—Triforce 14^(...) 23:03, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Support: You have considerably more mainspace edits than me, and I'm already an admin. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 23:20, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Support: Go for it. You tell us about most of the vandals on this place. Do some killing yourself. Mr Kmil

Support: Add my vote to your total. You definitely have what it takes.--Bek (talk) 02:38, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Support: Didn't know I could vote, but you got mine. --EveryDayJoe45 02:54, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Support: Really, it's obvious that you're a top-of-the-line contributor and would do well with the tools. McJeff 15:00, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Bek The Conqueror (administrator) Edit

The result of the discussion was: Support

Bek The Conqueror (talk · contributions · edit count)

I, Mr kmil, nominate Bek The Conqueror for admin powers. He has been working really hard. He is one of the best informers for what needs to be deleted, or if we have a vandal. If he had these powers, he could help our wiki much better, and much faster.

Votes Edit

Support: Aye, this time yer ready for the big time kid. Outstanding devotion to persistent vandals, a good view on what's good for the Wiki and a courteous guy. Definitely admin stuff. You got my vote. --AuronKaizer! 10:53, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Support: Yep, you definitely deserve it Bek.—Triforce 14^(...) 11:30, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Neutral: For the same reason as I told Triforce earlier in regards to time on the wiki. I agree you do deserve this, and I will support it b/c it is well deserved, but to be fair not only to Triforce but to others that had similar credentials in the past, I'm going to say wait for a short while, even just a few weeks. You've been on around for what, about the same time that Triforce has? Then I'll make my vote a definite support around the same time I do for his request as well. I gladly support your application, but I want to keep things fair too. Hero of Time 87 14:21, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Comment: Heh, looks like this one will have as much impact on the vote as the other one. --AuronKaizer! 15:21, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Support: Not doubt. I've always found you a trustworthy editor. On a sidenote, how many votes does one need to become an admin? --EveryDayJoe45 16:59, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Comment: I dunno, but I think Xykeb Zraliv was promoted at 6 or 7.—Triforce 14^(...) 17:05, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Comment: Yeah, the usual is six support votes for admin, five for rollback (although admittedly, there is no system). If you get one oppose vote, you need seven support votes. Makes sense, eh? --AuronKaizer! 17:25, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Comment: As AK said, there is no system really. There is no number persay, but yes Triforce is right, that is why I said that once he reached six months I'd gladly support his application, and the same applies here. Six months is typically a fair amount of time to have in for an admin request. Hero of Time 87 18:28, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Comment: HoT87, telling Bek that he can't become an admin now is like telling Jesus that he couldn't die, because he hadn't been on Earth long enough.

Comment: Since Bek and I are now the only two candidates now, and we have both proven to be trustworthy, is it really necessary to go with the whole 6 month thing? Not rushing you or anything, but just food for thought.—Triforce 14^(...) 02:04, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Comment: Triforce and other supporters of both candidates, nothing would please me more than to give the go-ahead now for you guys both to be awarded admin rights. You both deserve it in my estimations, but my reasoning for waiting is so that we don't set a precedent of letting users with increasingly less time on the wiki in total apply for admin status and b/c I've told users who have applied in the past that I wanted to wait to cast my vote for that very reason, b/c I felt it would be good for them to have a solid six-month experience with what powers they already held. The same principle applies here. I don't want those users whose former applications have been put into archives to come back and see that I approved someone who had equal or less time on the wiki to take full admin powers while denying their requests. This is about precedent, not about either of the two wonderful candidates who are applying now. And come on guys, it's two weeks (14 days), not two months. You've both been on for about the same amount of time and it's just a little longer. I know it seems petty and pointless to many of you, but this is more about setting precedent and honoring past precedents. I hope that's understandable. Please know that I will certainly change my vote to support by May 1st though for both of you. I want to see you both become admins though, I feel you'll both make fantastic caretakers of the wiki and will be a big help to those of us still active. Just please be patient for just a little longer though. Once you both do become admins, another instance will come up like this and you will know what I am talking about right now about setting precedents and honoring past ones. I know you may not think it's important right now as you are both anxious about inevitably having full support from all of us, but you will appreciate what I am saying here on down the road when you join the rest of us admins and are faced with future applications. It's never an easy choice when coming to a decision like this b/c the applicants are excited about being awarded their requests, but we also have to remember that like in the real world, setting precedents can affect those that are in the lead role or soon will be. There will come a day when Bek and Triforce will be faced with applications just like their own but also with others of varying credentials, and they will have to make the same calls we're making here. I feel that in future though that both applicants will understand and appreciate what I'm saying here. I've suggested before that we should lay out in print what requirements must be met for adminship to avoid these instances, but the idea has yet to be taken up by the full wiki or the full board of current sitting admins. Hero of Time 87 03:00, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Support: Since Triforce has already been awarded full rights, to make this fair between the two new candidates, I am going to go ahead and give my full support to Bek's application, but in future the process needs to be followed for all users. Hero of Time 87 04:21, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

EveryDayJoe45 (administrator) Edit

The result of the discussion was: Support

EveryDayJoe45 (talk · contributions · edit count)

I had planned to run for this at a later date. But after discussing this with Triforce, I figure now is as good a time as any; if something goes wrong, I can just try again in a month or so. There will be no hard feelings if you feel the need to oppose, I will understand your point of view, and respect it. And if you support me, thanks. --EveryDayJoe45 (talk) 15:59, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Votes Edit

Support: Heh, it was fun dukin' it out with you in the beginning, but there's no reason in the world that you shouldn't be an admin. You're a great asset to Zeldapedia. —Triforce 14 16:34, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Support:The only reason that you wouldn't become an admin is that there are a lot of active admins now. However, I myself don't consider that a good reason for an oppose vote.--Bek (talk) 17:04, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Support: You've got more edits than most of the people that are already admins (including me) and you're one of the most active editors on the site. There's simply no logical reason for me to oppose. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 17:08, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Support: Simply put, one of the best editors on Zeldapedia, and granting him the rank of admin would benefit ZP in so many ways. You deserve this, Joe. --AuronKaizer! 20:44, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Support: No point in waiting, you becoming admin is inevitable. Metroidhunter32 21:11, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Comment: This was pretty quick. Thanks everybody for your support, just one more vote needed. --EveryDayJoe45 (talk) 01:42, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Support:I suppose that will be me. Support wizzrobes too. Dialask77 Ice Wizard 01:45, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Oni Dark Link (rollback) Edit

The result of the discussion was: Support

Oni Dark Link (talk · contributions · edit count))

I am here requesting roll back rights and am going to keep this short. You all know me and ive been here quite a while and my contributions are roll back wordy (in my opinion) but its not what i want that matter its what you want so vote yes or no and lets see whatll happen.

Votes Edit

Support: If it was for admin I would say no. But you are definitely dedicated to this wiki, and you are on enough where this could really help us. Plus you got caught in that scrum on the Link page the other day and held that vandal at bay without rollback, which gives you extra merit. --EveryDayJoe45 (talk) 22:31, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Support: Per EDJ45.--Bek (talk) 22:37, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Comment: thanks Guys. its nice to see the vandal thing being appriciated. by the way it was only yesterday. ive seen a few references to it being a couple of days ago. or have i been sleeping longer then i thought? Oni Dark Link 22:45, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Support:Your loyal to the wiki, ever benevolent, and always helpful. Plus you are always supporting wizzrobes. Dialask77 Ice Wizard 00:05, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Support: I think you are definitely deserving of rollback rights. If I may, before you run for Admin though (if you choose to), you should work on your spelling/grammar/wiki markup. The spellcheck feature on Firefox helps for the spelling part. DIBS ON PROMOTING IF/WHEN HE MAKES IT :)—Triforce 14 00:07, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Comment: Well, you can go ahead and promote him. He's reached a plus 4 with no opposes. --EveryDayJoe45 (talk) 00:12, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Hero Of Wisdom (administrator, remove all rights) Edit

Hero Of Wisdom (talk · contributions · edit count)

Votes Edit

Support: I say, get rid of him. A disgrace to the wiki. Only 33 mainspace edits. IMHO, he hurt this wiki, with constant cursing and clubs that didn't benefit anyone but himself... Plus, he quit... UberPhoeb 19:51, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Support: Well, he's no longer around and I don't see anything he did that showed he deserved rights.—Triforce 14 19:57, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Support: Not deserving in the first place, and has not been on in a long time. --EveryDayJoe45 (talk) 20:02, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Support:Doesn't deserve it in the least. Metroidhunter32 20:50, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Support:Got nothing to say that everybody else hasn't said.--Bek (talk) 21:09, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Support:Malevolence, plus inactivity, means that he didn't deserve rights in the first place. Dialask77 Ice Wizard 03:23, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Lord link (b'crat, remove all rights) Edit

Lord link (talk · contributions · Special:Editcount/Lord link)

Votes Edit

Support: Not the slightest bit worthy, with only 65 mainspace edits. He was like HoW, but no cursing. Quitter! UberPhoeb 19:51, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Support: He quit too, and didn't really show that he deserved rights.—Triforce 14 19:57, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Support: Same as HoW --EveryDayJoe45 (talk) 20:02, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Neutral:He doesn't really deserve it but without him I wouldn't be here at all. Metroidhunter32 20:50, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Support:Got nothing to say that everybody else hasn't said.--Bek (talk) 21:10, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Support:Based on previous statements, it doesn't seem he deserves the rights he attained. Dialask77 Ice Wizard 03:24, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Hero of Time 87 (b'crat, remove b'crat rights only) Edit

Hero of Time 87 (talk · contributions · edit count)

Votes Edit

Support: He made LL an admin, leading to HoW becoming one. He has a hot temper, and a big ego. He always has to get his way, and starts huge arguments that everybody hates. Anything else? Right, he's barely active. UberPhoeb 19:51, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Support: Well this will come back to haunt us, I'm sure, but giving others rights without due process is not right.—Triforce 14 19:57, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Support: Don't know much about this, but giving people rights in this fashion is unforgivable. And I'd like to give him the benefit of the doubt, but he seems to have a hot temper and always needs to "win". --EveryDayJoe45 (talk) 20:02, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Support:Correct me if I'm wrong but Admins are supposed to be good editors? Metroidhunter32 20:50, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Support:He abused the rights of a bureaucrat, thus he should lose those rights. Also for conduct unbecoming an admin. We do not have room for a bureaucrat who does little but stir up trouble and bring out the worst in everybody that he speaks to.--Bek (talk) 21:12, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Support:I am...hesitent about doing this... I know hero of time, and it is true that he does start conflicts very easily...but...being a conflict starter at times doesn't necessarily mean that he doesn't entirely deserve demotion... but i wasn't around when he was more active and poorly promoted admins, and based on what I have heard, he may be worthy of some demotion... Dialask77 Ice Wizard 03:27, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Neutral: he might not have the best personality but he does have 2000 edits and voting some one out when there not here isnt really right. Oni Dark Link 16:06, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Comment:He was just here the other day with another argument, and the fact that he's not very active is kind of one of the points of the nomination for demotion.--Bek (talk) 23:42, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Support: Everything's already been said. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 02:19, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Comment:Bek's right, plus, idk if he has even edited a mainspace page in over a year. I always saw him of a theory guy... UberPhoeb 02:45, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Oppose: I don't know if voting for this is over but I just saw it, so give me a break. I oppose this vote, because HoT87 is a friend, and he was the first person to help me get started on this wiki. Mr kmil

Baltro (rollback) Edit

The result of the discussion was: Support

Baltro (talk · contributions · edit count)

I Oni Dark Link nominate Baltro for Rollback. He has made many good edits in the past month and substantial increased his edit count. One requirement for Rollback is to have at least two months of active membership but I am willing to over look this for a high edit count. Plus at the moment we are quite short of admins and throwing another Rollbacker onto the team is always good.

Votes Edit

Support: Yeah, I'll support this now. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 17:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Support: Well to be clear Oni you cannot overlook anything dealing with promotion requirements. But since XYZ is probably fine with it and I am as well this can stay. And I think Baltro is a good candidate for rollback. --EveryDayJoe45 (talk) 17:55, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Support: Yeah, he's only like 5 days short of meeting the time requirement anyway.—Triforce 14 22:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Comments Edit

Comment: Well, the rules state that, with the discretion of admins, one can go for rollback or admin rights even if he or she does not have the minimum requirements. Technically, no, Oni Dark Link did not discuss it with any admins, but if most (or hopefully all) admins are fine with it anyway, we can probably let it slide. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 18:00, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Darknut15 (rollback) Edit

The result of the discussion was: Support

Darknut15 (talk . contributions . editcount) )

I am applying for Rollback rights at the behast of my fellow users, and because I think that I could stop more Vandals with said rights. I will not misuse these rights. I do not have much else to say other than to look at my edits, and judge for yourself.

Votes Edit

Support: i believe you would be a fine rollbacker. you are for the most part, level headed and would not misuse the rights. if im the only support so be it, i stand by this.--C2 00:46, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Support: I was actually considering nominating you myself soon. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 00:48, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Support: You are an invaluable member of our community and your edits, attitude, and consistency definitely boost your reason to run for this. —Baltro [ talk · edits ] 00:52, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Comment: i missed baltros so being the first makes up for this i hope :)--C2 00:55, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Support: always good to have anothere member of the team Oni Dark Link 10:45, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Ccbermanzzpedia (Rollback) Edit

The result of the discussion was: Support

Ccbermanzzpedia (talk · contributions · edit count))

I, would like to nominate myself for rollback. I have been on this wiki actively for the last two months, and have made an effort to better the wiki. I have had some growing pains, but feel that as of now that I am ready for rollback rights. I believe that I am responsible enough to handle these rights. Here goes nothin'.....

Votes Edit

Support:You've been a good part of the community.—Triforce 14 23:25, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Support: Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 23:39, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Support:Been a great part of the community, is very wise and careful, and a great friend(XD). So YES.--Shade Link

Support:I seriously need to edit more, I've been passed up yet again. But you do deserve it. Metroidhunter32 01:32, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

TheNewSheik (For Rollback Nomination) Edit

The result of the discussion was: Support

TheNewSheik (talk · contributions · edit count))

TheNewSheik – Shadow is neither dark nor light, is the twilight between Hyrule perfection and the greed of the people… TALK – Favorite article: Sheikah I started in this wikia as an amateur basic TLoZ fan, I only used it to read, I liked to see the connections and the many things, characters, stories, theories, trivia that I didn't know about this universe of the game that I so longingly played and didn't care at that moment. Suddenly one day I saw an article that crept my soul, Sheikah, an stub in this site, so I decided to became an user to improve it. When I did that and while I developed it, I uploaded images, discussed articles, proposed theories, make relations with admins and users that support me on my decisions, created articles, a group member when groups existed, and so much more. Now I stand here, as a person that know almost anything in the series, with that Sheikah article now as a featured one, and here asking for rollback (not administrator because that is something for admins that have put effort much much times more) but rollback just to give a little more of myself to this wikia. I swear allegiance to Zeldapedia as Sheikah to the Hyrule Family. Make your vote and don't fear on commenting your opinion, I'll be here to hear you as a Gossip Stone… PD: I wanted to put a list of what I've done here, but a little summary of the most important things I've done can be found on my user page.

Votes Edit

Support: While I haven't had the opportunity to work with you that often, you clearly fulfill the requirements, so that's a plus. You have made many good contributions, and I have seen many talk pages where you point out major and minor things in the article that need changing or remind others of what the article should be looking like (basically your reminders like this, which I always personally enjoy). I think you would make a nice rollbacker. In my opinion, rollback and requesting it is pretty much half about reverting the vandalism, while the other half is just loyalty and hard work, which shows when a user is granted rollback. —Baltro [ talk · edits ] 06:36, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Support: Your work on the Sheikah article was amazing, and you've quite a few other useful things as well. And your opening speech was just too good to not support you :P Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 06:53, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Support:Yep you should have done this a long time ago :)—Triforce 14 11:32, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Support: youve been most helpful, and deffinatley deserve the rights. congrats :)--C2 12:13, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Comment: this must be some kind of record. two new rollback in 24 hrs.....VANDALZ BEWARE!--C2 12:13, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Support:You should know why.

Comment:I just noticed, everything that happened to NewSheik happened to me, except the Sheikah part--Shade Link

Baltro (administrator) Edit

The result of the discussion was: Support

Baltro (talk · contributions · edit count)

Well, the time has finally come that I do this. I'm Baltro, and I'm pretty sure you all are aware of who I am, as I've been consistently editing here for about the last three months. I guess the reasons I should be an administrator is that I've made significant contributions (most recent projects include fixing the Zelda II towns/Ocarina sages, rewriting the Hyrule article, splitting up the list of locations article by game, along with some older stuff that I don't really keep track of). I've shown that I'm able to keep my cool when the editing gets hot, and I've done my best to keep the editing cool in the first place, as I'm always happy to get a third opinion, or seek conflict resolution. The reasons I'm going for administrator are actually quite simply: to block vandals and to be able to delete pages. To be honest, I'm not really that looking forward to being being an authority figure, but it doesn't mean I won't give my all at it. What I'm interested in is just making this place the best it can be, and my specialty for that lies in fixing stuff and making things run smoother. Thank you for the time :) —Baltro [ talk · edits ] 03:11, September 2, 2009 (UTC)

Votes Edit

Support:Absolutely Not You've been doing great and we could use another helping hand around here. Just don't up and quit after you get admin rights ;p—Triforce 14 03:15, September 2, 2009 (UTC)

Support: Errr, I'd say something here, but you pretty much covered it all. You definitely deserve them. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 03:15, September 2, 2009 (UTC)

Support I believe you may have did this a long time ago, you are an excellent authority in this wikia even when you may not like to be. You always try to solve discussions and make a good editing job in the articles. Green light, we need more active admins. TheNewSheik (talk) 10:32, September 2, 2009 (UTC)

Support:not gonna miss this time! :P you've covered everything(so dont make your thing so long :P) and even if you dont want to ve an authority figure, you've already been one as a rollbacker. so go ahead!-- C2 / CC 13:29, September 2, 2009 (UTC)

Comment:o and dont just leave or stop contributing when you get them, but i dont worry now. and yes your intentions were not in the right place, but i feel that they are.-- C2 / CC 15:47, September 2, 2009 (UTC)

Support: Will make a good admin I think. --EveryDayJoe45 (talk) 15:58, September 2, 2009 (UTC)

Support: a purely amazing increase in main spasce edits in such a short time. how can a person not vote for this guy? Oni Dark Link 18:51, September 2, 2009 (UTC)

Ccbermanzzpedia (administrator) Edit

The result of the discussion was: Support

Ccbermanzzpedia (talk · contributions · edit count))

Well, here I go. I feel that I deserve these rights because I try to be as nice and as friendly towards everyone; I know a lot about how the wiki works, although not everything I will not hide that; and I have helped captured many vandals. I always try to help out the wiki in anyway I can, and help out any users who need assitance. I feel that I would use these rights properly and will promise to not misuse them and set a good example for all users. Think what you will of me, I just try my best and always will.

Votes Edit

Support: Yeah, it's definitely time. You have proven yourself to be a dedicated and helpful member of the community and you fully deserve this. However, there are aspects to being an admin we'll have to tell you a bit about once/if you're promoted. This is a big step, make sure you're ready to accept a big responsibility! Hope you make it through. --AuronKaizer! 00:18, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

Comment:I'll listen whole-heartedly to any adive you or another admin gives me. I feel the pressure and feel that I can take it on!-- C2 / CC 00:20, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

Support: What AK said. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 00:22, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

Support: Ccbermanzzpedia has been absolutely amazing as a friend, an editor, and a vandal hunter. I feel he will use his powers to help Zeldapedia tremendously, and he is ready to be an Administrator. He deserves to become an Administrator. The Midna (talk) 00:22, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

Support: At first, I doubted you'd end up being admin material, but you've really come a long way. I doubt you'll abuse your powers, but just remember they CAN be taken away if they are misused. Good luck though :)—Triforce 14 00:23, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

Support: As AK said there is a lot of things you need to work on. To say no because of that, however, is just not right. You are one of the most dedicated current editors and you are very helpful to users in many aspects. --EveryDayJoe45 (talk) 00:24, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

Support: There isn't much left to say that everyone else hasn't already brought up, but CC is an outstanding editor and very kind to all users. I support this wholeheartedly. :) —Lisa URAQT 00:57, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

Support: what they said Oni Dark Link 14:31, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

Support: No more to say, you deserve it, we're grateful for great your work. TheNewSheik (talk) 18:14, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

Jedimasterlink (rollback) Edit

Jedimasterlink (talk . contributions . editcount)

The result of the discussion was: Support

Jedimasterlink – You say I need a life? Where can I download one of those? TALK – REVIEWS — EDIT COUNT — CONTRIBUTIONS — TOC Well, here I go. I have decided to run for Rollback rights because I feel qualified for it. These rights, should I earn them, will be used only for the sake of this wiki, and I will not misuse or abuse them. I've been here for for a few months now, so I imagine most of you have a good idea what I have done around here. Vote as you feel led based on what you have seen from me.

Votes Edit

Support: It's just the one button, but yeah your ready. -- C2 / CC 22:08, November 1, 2009 (UTC)

Support: Sure. --AuronKaizer! 22:10, November 1, 2009 (UTC)

Support: Why not? You've made some good contributions. --EveryDayJoe45 (talk) 23:00, November 1, 2009 (UTC)

Support: You've still got a while to go before you're ready for admin, but I think you're deserving of rollback. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 23:16, November 1, 2009 (UTC)

Support: Ya know it's funny, I was just considering nominating you yesterday. You hang around in the background most of the time so I didn't really notice you until recently, but you're a pretty good contributor.—Triforce 14 23:21, November 1, 2009 (UTC)

Support: with CC gone up to admin the roll back list has been a bit short. aside from that you have all the reasons to deserve it Oni Dark Link 16:44, November 2, 2009 (UTC)

Support: Yep, some pretty good edits. --Z31T)6311 21:24, November 2, 2009 (UTC)

Zelda311 (rollback) Edit

The result of the discussion was: Oppose

Zelda311 (talk · contributions · edit count))

I AM ERROR.

Zelda311 – Never go to bed mad. Stay up and fight. TALK LEGEND OF ZELDA: XENTORE REALM OF MASKS FIVE KILLERS So I recently made a little more than 400 mainspace edits. I realized that I could run for Rollback! I would like Rollback because I would not abuse my powers, I would use them wisely, I will make great edits when Spirit Tracks gets released. I have already made great edits like the Events Navigation Box Template and the Groups Navigation Box Template. As well as the list of items pages. I've been active for a year, so I have experience. And I would really like that extra button. Thankyou, Zelda311.

Votes Edit

Neutral: I've had a hard time forgetting the alternate wiki stunt, but you've shown improvement. At this rate you may be able to change my mind but you're not there yet. --AuronKaizer! 07:48, November 3, 2009 (UTC)

Comment: I can get that, really, I can. I see that I caused a lot of trouble, and I again apologize for copying the main page. But I'd like to think the good things I do "out-weigh" the cons. That and asking for signatures on my userpage that one time way back when are the only bad things I can really think of. And as I recall, The alternate wiki is Zeldapedia's sister Wiki. --Z31T)6311 10:13, November 3, 2009 (UTC)

Neutral: You've made some good edits, but you haven't consistently stood out. Keep up what you've been doing recently and I'll probably change my vote next time.—Triforce 14 12:53, November 3, 2009 (UTC)

Oppose: Your not ready yet. Don't count this against me, and the Groups Nav was a good idea, you've helped out and have been here for a year. On the same token I just had to undo and rewrite all of the pages you just created, and this is on top of the ZG stuff. I'm sorry, I really am, but you have to wait a little bit longer, you'll be ready in no time. Not going to happen for quite awhile. Simply not ready.-- C2 / CC 16:46, November 3, 2009 (UTC)

Comment: I'd rather not talk about Zelda Gazette. I've left Zelda Gazette and am not returning, the shame of having it just can't be forgotten. --Z31T)6311 17:02, November 3, 2009 (UTC)

Support: its only roll back. in my opinion one button cant hurt. Oni Dark Link

Oppose: I have to agree with CC. You've done some great work recently, but I simply don't think you're ready just yet. If you keep up the good work, I'll probably support next time, but not now. In light of recent events, I have to change this to just a flat-out no. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 19:29, November 3, 2009 (UTC)

Oppose:You've done some good stuff around here, but I'm not sure I can 100% trust you just yet. Keep it up, though, and I may support you in the near future.What Xykeb said. Sorry about this, but you've got to be much more responsible. Jedimasterlink (talk) 23:06, November 3, 2009 (UTC)

Oppose: If this was a few days ago, I'd be neutral, but now I am starting to see the fault in our requirements for promotion. The way I see it is different from what the others seem to be saying. Since applying you have made mass edits to up your edit count purely to gain power, and many of them had to be reverted. If anything I think a change to the admin/rollback promotions is in order. --EveryDayJoe45 (talk) 00:38, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

Neutral: rack up some edits in the mainspace, then I'll change my vote to a support, m'kay? Start editing mainspace more constantly. Mr kmil

MaloMart (rollback) Edit

The result of the discussion was: Support

MaloMart (talk · contributions · edit count))

Hey, everyone. I have recently reached 400 edits on this wiki, and I thought it was time to request rollback rights. I've been on here for about six months now, and I believe that I've made some useful contributions to the wiki. If I were granted rollback rights, I assure you that I would use them to combat vandals and help Zeldapedia as a whole.

Votes Edit

Neutral: I'm really not sure on this one. Yes, you've made some good edits here, but you're inconsistent and you don't edit a whole lot proportionate to how long you've been here. You have nearly twice as many user edits as mainspace edits when it really should be the other way around. So I don't know what to say. I have no doubt that you won't abuse these rights, but I'm just not sure you're ready for them. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 20:16, November 29, 2009 (UTC)

Support: You do a lot of good stuff around here, seem to know how the wheels turn around here and am also easy to work with! But like Zraliv said there, if you wish to advance past this, you'll have to be more consistent with your editing and concentrate more effort into the mainspace. --AuronKaizer! 21:18, November 29, 2009 (UTC)

Support: I've seen some pretty good stuff come from you, and I'm confident you will use your rights wisely. Consistency issues aside, I say you're ready for this. Jedimasterlink (talk) 21:23, November 29, 2009 (UTC)

Neutral: Don't know where to go with this. You have been here quite a long time and you have reached the minimum edit count. Also, I see you are not just running just to gain power, but instead want rollback rights to help the wiki. On the other hand, we seem to be giving promotions to everyone these days and see nothing here that overwhelmingly makes me want to support. I think you are a good editor but the points brought up by the previous votes are good ones too. I won't oppose nor support, but instead just stay neutral and let this run its course. --EveryDayJoe45 (talk) 21:28, November 29, 2009 (UTC)

Support: Its only roll back cant hurt to have another vandal reverter around Oni Dark Link 21:35, November 29, 2009 (UTC)

Support: You deserve it. Rollback can't hurt, either. -- 22:38, November 29, 2009 (UTC), your man of the world.

Support:I see no reason why you don't deserve rollback.—Triforce 14 23:06, November 29, 2009 (UTC)

Support: Well same argument, I don't see why you shouldn't. I expect you to effort even more with the rollback. TheNewSheik (talk) 04:28, November 30, 2009 (UTC)