FANDOM


Replacement filing cabinet This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current talk page.

Requests for promotion

The King of the Loveless (administrator)

The result of the discussion was: Pictogram voting oppose Oppose


I am The King of the Loveless I feel like I should be a administrator for 4 different reasons.

1) I have played and beaten ALMOST all of the Legend of Zelda's.

2) I am not going to abuse anypowers that I may recieve as admin.

3) I used to edit the FF Wiki so I am experienced in the way of the Wiki.

4) I am extremely helpful and polite to everyone that I see because I treat everyone with respect.

I hope that I make if not then there is allways another day. So please leave comments I would love to hear what you guys think of me.

Votes

Pictogram voting neutral Neutral: Do not take this the wrong way but I was told not to run for admin really soon. First you must go to become a rollback and be nice to others, edit and help others. Then after about two months, you can run. For now, just run for rollback like I am!Gerudo Ruler 18:20, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose: I really don't think that you should be an admin looking at how many we have, and I haven't seen you editing much. Mr kmil
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose You've only made 67 edits, 2 of which are in the main namespace. Your first edit was 5 days ago. You have not been here long enough to show how good of a contributor you are; generally, to become an admin, you need to have done a lot of work improving and maintaining and creating articles. You haven't done any of this. You're also a new user here; for all we know, you might be lying and just want to abuse sysop privileges. Try requesting again in a few months.--Richard 01:09, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: Thank you Richard thats what I want to hear how I can better myself. Now I have a goal set thanks.--The King of the Loveless
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose: Basically, Richard said it all. Room for improvement, but the spark of talent is there. Just stop editing my sub-pages. And do the stuff he said. And maybe. Of course, we could tell you to do all kinds of things and not give you admin rights anyway...beware or something? Yeah, I'm running out of stuff to say here. --AuronKaizerKennedy! 01:29, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment As I said before thank you for the comment I would expect nothing less than constructive critiscism. (Honestly I just requested adminship to see what it was that I needed to improve on) I am still open to any more suggestions on how I may be a better editor on this wiki.--The King of the Loveless
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose:No offense but If people think Im not ready your definetley not ready.nintendoworker 13:57, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Aghanim the Mage (administrator)

The result of the discussion was: Pictogram voting oppose Oppose


I Believe I should have Admin Rights because:

1. I have experience in The Legend of Zelda, The Legend of Zelda:Twilight Princess, Ocarina of Time, and A Link to the Past.


2. I am very responsible, and will make sure I live up to my title.


3. I am a very nice guy, and I only want to give as much as I can to the Wiki.


4. I can make my own userboxes, and am completely willing to take any requests.


5. The people here have given me some very good welcomes, and I thank them (I have a loss of friends at school) so I think I owe them something.

Votes

Pictogram voting neutral Neutral: You're doing pretty well, but it's a little too early for you to be requesting administrative rights. Maybe rollback in a little while. LadyNorbert 18:30, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose: Fifteen admins... Oh so many... And you haven't been around long. OtOcon^_- 18:38, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral: Good Job so far: OtO: most of them are inactive (more like 6 of them) UberPhoeb(Fic Walkthrus Fullmetalpedia) 18:54, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: He should have rollback rights in a 3 or 4 weeks, thats when I (I think) got mine. UberPhoeb(Fic Walkthrus Fullmetalpedia) 18:54, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral: He's got some things to learn about respecting other people's edits. Also has a tendency to be a bit malicious. --AuronKaizerKennedy! 02:27, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral: Sorry buddy. You need to wait a bit. Mr kmil
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose: Admin? No. I haven't seeen many contributions from you, and we already have 15 admin.
Pictogram voting support Support: Although I belive that 15 is alot of admins I feel that you deserve my support--The King of the Loveless
Pictogram voting support Support: You seem pretty mello, kind, and go with the flow. That seems pretty nice. Besides, 15 admins- PUH-LEASE! That is like having two or so! I believe you deserve it! Gerudo Ruler 21:00, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Hero Of Wisdom (rollback)

The result of the discussion was: Pictogram voting oppose Oppose


Hi, I would like to request for RB. I know I'm not exactly the nicest person here, in reality, no one is, I have seen many arguments and anger over stupid topics. If you fill as though I need to make more contributions, please tell me and I will hop to it.

Votes

Pictogram voting support Support: hes made lots of nice contrebutions to the wiki i think he deserves rollback rights--Lord Link
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose: Sorry, you've shown improvement but haven't really done enough to warrant rollback rights. --AuronKaizerKennedy! 02:14, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting support Support: you seem to be taking this serious. More serious than I would! Good!Gerudo Ruler 20:53, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose: Wait. Aren't we working to take away his admin? --Mr kmil 22:20, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Aeronflux (administrator)

The result of the discussion was: Pictogram voting support Support


i think this guy deeseveres admin at least sysop he has done ALOT of edits most of them being main if ya dont think admin then rollback for shure check his contribs--Lord Link

Votes

Pictogram voting support Support: Rollback rights are cool, but admin/sysop is a bit too early. --AuronKaizerKennedy! 00:57, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting support Support: Ya, rollback. --God Of Thunder!!! 17:01, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting support Support: ya i agree with you guys just a bit to early for adminship. but your well on your way ;)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: There is so much support for this guy, I don't want to oppose him. But I haven't seen anything from this guy. Servant of God 22:26, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Solar Flute (rollback)

The result of the discussion was: Pictogram voting support Support


The main reason I'm running is to stop vandalism. I've encountered enough vandalism and I want to do something about it. I've been a user for 6 months, helped this wiki, made a lot of userboxes, and worked up to featured users. I also am one of the after hours users (i have isomnia) and I think an after hours admin (or at least a rollback) would help.

Votes

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose: You are just too mean and you do not help anyone here so what I'm saying is that you stink.
Pictogram voting support Support: You contribute nicely and seem to know what you're doing. I'd shoot for rollback rights, though, since we're kinda swamped with admins. --God Of Thunder!!! 16:53, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting support Support: What was that first person's problem? I mean really, they should have at least signed their username...well anyway, I think you should be admin. --Moblin slayer 01:05, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose: You do good stuff around here, but not "admin" stuff. Which, as you of course know, involves hazing users and breaking rules >:) but seriously y'all. Rollback is all you need to help us here, there should be enough admins around at all times to do the banning, which doesn't really occur, that often, really. Maybe rollback rights, but admin rights...I don't think so. --AuronKaizerKennedy! 01:22, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting support Support: ya no admin rights but rollback is cool--Lord linkMGS! 05:12, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: one quick thing, the first oppose voter was RANGER12345. Solar flute 23:57, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose:yeah you are kinda mean.nintendoworker
Pictogram voting support Support: I agree that you should have rollback. And Tritem/nintendoworker, I haven't seen Solar flute being rude to anybody intentionally or to a big extent. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 04:03, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: Do revenge votes (Tritem's and Ranger's) count? Because I am pretty sure they voted against me becuase I voted against them. Solar flute
Pictogram voting comment Comment: They shouldn't, but I'm pretty sure they do. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 04:03, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting support Support: I've changed my vote, actually. You do good enough stuff to warrant rollback rights. But I'm not a man to take back what I said, so my older vote has been crossed out. I stand by little to none of what I said back then, but that's what I said so I won't remove it. --AuronKaizerTalk loud, hit harder! 00:54, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting support Support: (snorts) "Running?" You make this sound like an election! I think through your "meaness," your a shoein. --Mr kmil 22:22, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Bek The Conqueror (rollback)

The result of the discussion was: Pictogram voting support Support


Hey, everybody. I'm running for rollback because I think that I will be able to use it well. I have helped take down five vandals throughout Wikia, three of which were at Zeldapedia. I have also fixed many links around the wiki, and even some templates. I think that I would be a very good, responsible person to grant rollback rights to, as I have made nothing but good faith edits to this wiki, and about 60 percent of my edits are in the main namespace. Bek The Conqueror 22:41, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Votes

Pictogram voting support Support: Yeah, you definitely deserve rollback. --Moblin Slayer 23:34, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting support Support ya I think you could use it hands up to you for not goin strait to admin--griff 00:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral You are doing a lot of good work, but I think one month is still too early. Keep it up and you'll get it eventually, though— Triforce 14(...) 03:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting support Support: Major player as far as link fixing and vandalism goes. A shoe-in for rollback here. --AuronKaizer(...Kaizer!) 16:13, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting support Support Hmm i change my mind. You really do a lot to help Zeldapedia and you deserve rollback.— Triforce 14(...) 21:37, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting support Support: He's does a good job. I'm not saying it because he complimented me. Μρ κμιλ

Xykeb Zraliv (administrator)

The result of the discussion was: Pictogram voting support Support


Xykeb Zraliv (talk · contributions · edit count)

I don't know how much support I'm going to get, but I figure I may as well put it out there. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 17:43, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Votes

Pictogram voting neutral Neutral: After your previous promotion to rollback user, it appears as if you slowed things down and stopped making as many mainspace edits. While you do possess the Wiki know-how and professionalism needed to become an administrator, you need to put in more effort into editing actual pages rather than talk pages. Don't worry, you'll get there, eventually. --AuronKaizer(...Kaizer!) 19:34, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: Yeah, that's kind of what I expected. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 19:50, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: Heh, they all say that, don't they? Anyway, I'm just one guy; don't expect this vote to be over just yet. Also, should this bid for adminship fail, don't forget to take to heart everything said in these votes; 'cause once you do, you'll be an admin before you know it. Hmm, come to think of it, that should also apply if you are promoted. --AuronKaizer(...Kaizer!) 19:55, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting support Support:You are helpfull to the extreme and I think that you would make a great admin. Metroidhunter32 22:13, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting support Support: What can I say, your probably one of the best editors around here now, and considering the large amount of inactive admins, we definitely do need a new one in my opinion. And in my opinion, you'd be a great admin. --Moblin Slayer|(I'm working on it...) 00:26, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting support Support: You do a lot of good work, just be sure to concentrate on the mainspace more than other stuff— Triforce 14(...) 05:29, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting support Support: I may not be an admin or have rollback rights etc, but you do a good bit of good work and are generally friendly in the talk areas, so I feel I must support. Actually I thought you were an admin when I first came here...XD Dialask77 14:38, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: Wow, I wasn't expecting so much support my first time.... Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 18:30, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment:Looks like it will be your only time too. I don't see you losing this one. Metroidhunter32 00:17, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting support Support: Meh, screw my previous statement; XZ as admin would benefit all of ZP in all manner of aspects. You've got my vote, kid. --AuronKaizer(...Kaizer!) 00:09, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting support Support: You've got my vote. You're one of the most helpful contributor around, you're gonna be great as an admin. PGU27
Pictogram voting comment Comment: How many support votes do I need? Because I seem to have a lot already..... Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 19:37, 16 February 2009 (UTC)


Triforce 14 (rollback)

The result of the discussion was: Pictogram voting support Support


Triforce 14 (talk · contributions · edit count)

I, AuronKaizer, hereby nominate Triforce 14 for rollback rights for the following reasons.

  1. Contributes like a crazy non-stop Jammin' Ninja.
  2. Knows the Wikia coding to a tee.
  3. Knows how the Zeldapedia formatting and markup works.
  4. Contributes to discussions, asks and solves questions
  5. Is a helpful and friendly editor to be around.

In short; why in the name of Jebus would T14 NOT qualify for rollback? Seriously. By the standards we have, could be the best potential admin I've seen in a long long time. But that's just me. Now, get votin'.


I agree with the aforementioned things. Although I may not always be correct/friendly in my editing, I can learn from my mistakes and apologize to those whom I offend —Triforce 14(...)

Votes

Pictogram voting support Support: Definitely deserving of rollback. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 00:05, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: Uh, just so I don't appear to be a thoughtless shill, feel free to make your own case on why you deserve rollback rights instead of my "professional" summary. >.> --AuronKaizer(...Kaizer!) 00:07, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: You mean like add in some stuff below what you wrote or what?— Triforce 14(...) 00:15, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: I was thinkin' you could replace what I wrote if you don't like it. --AuronKaizer(...Kaizer!) 00:18, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: Could I just "second" it?— Triforce 14(...) 00:34, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting support Support:You mean he's not rollback already? Wow, that makes no sense (I'm rollback and he deserves it way more than I do...) --Moblin Slayer|(I'm working on it...) 02:41, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting support Support:He's really helpful around the wiki, and has more contributions than me, who actually has rollback. --Bek The Conqueror 22:10, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

McJeff (rollback)

The result of the discussion was: Pictogram voting support Support


McJeff (talk · contributions · edit count)

I've been on Zelda Wikia for several months now. I've contributed a lot of mainspace content. Focused primarily on enemy articles, but I also went through the Wanted Articles list and created many of them. I'm active, and I'm easily reachable as I check wikia if not this specific one every day. This wiki is pretty low on vandalism but I've caught some, mostly centered around the user that added the fake Zhahz article, that rollback would have made easier to fix.

Votes

Pictogram voting support Support: Heh, I'm just glad (?) that someone is around to help contribute Zelda II material, at which you're a freakin wiz. Sure, you're worthy of rollback. --AuronKaizer(...Kaizer!) 10:07, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting support Support: Agreed—Triforce4Triforce 14(...) 12:22, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting support Support: Yeah, sounds great, especially considering you're probably one of the only people on this site who has played through Zelda II without suffering from a debilitating aneurysm... --Moblin SlayerIce Wizzrobe (The Minish Cap) 00:18, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: Yeah kudos to you for that O.o—Triforce4Triforce 14(...) 00:54, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting support Support What they said. --Bek The Conqueror 20:56, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Bek The Conqueror (administrator)

The result of the discussion was: Pictogram voting oppose Oppose


Bek The Conqueror (talk · contributions · edit count)

I've been here for a while now, and have landed myself over a thousand edits, more if you count the image categorizing, tagging for deletion, etc. on pages that have since been deleted... they don't add to your edit count once they've been deleted. Anyhoo, I also have 11 vandals that I've helped to take down, by reverting their edits and reporting them to an admin. I am reasonably proficient with wiki coding, and while it will be a long time before I will be creating templates from scratch, I can usually find where the errors are in things that don't work. Long story short, I think that there's a lot more work to be done here, and having another admin around will help to keep it from piling up.

Votes

Pictogram voting neutral Neutral: Your professional and friendly tone along with your oodles and oodles of redirect fixes and God-Only-Knows-What-Else edits is more than enough to convince me that you are mature enough for this task. However...I feel that you need a couple more months of "development time"...just this gut feeling. Don't worry though, unless you turn heel on me as a result of this non-support vote, it'll turn into a support one in time :) --AuronKaizer(...Kaizer!) 03:27, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral: I agree, you're definitely a very helpful editor, but you need a little more time. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 03:30, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral Your contributions have been high quality so far, but 4 months is a little quick to make someone an admin. I'd suggest applying for rollback first, as I can't see you being denied that and it's a good way to prove yourself. You already have it. I probably should've checked first. McJeff 03:53, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral I concur with the previous posters, you have given some wonderful and insightful edits to the wiki and have been a great help. However, a little more time would not hurt for full administrator rights. I'd also suggest applying for rollback rights first perhaps and using those for a while to show you can definitely and properly handle full administrator powers as well. In time however, you'll also have my support as well one way or the other. Hero of Time 87 13:32, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: He already has rollback rights, Hero of Time 87. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 19:29, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: Hehe, senility is lame, eh? --AuronKaizer(...Kaizer!) 22:02, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment:In order to clear this from the list of unresolved requests, I move that this request be closed under "Betta luck next time!".--Bek (talk) 23:49, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Metroidhunter32 (rollback)

Metroidhunter32 (talk · contributions · edit count)

I know that I've been on the wiki for only a few months but I intend to remain a regular contributer to the wiki and if there is any doubt as to weather I will use the power correctly you can check on the metroid wiki

Votes

Pictogram voting support Support: Keep up the good work and you'll be in in no time. You done good kid. You've done good ςιττυ Μαν 22:30, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral: Your contributions to another Wiki doesn't really matter all that much to us, but your contributions here have been helpful. However, you're not quite at that level yet. You'll get there. In time. --AuronKaizer(...Kaizer!) 21:39, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral: What they said. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 23:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose: Sorry, just not enough mainspace edits yet to warrant for Rollback—Triforce4Triforce 14(...) 01:21, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

EveryDayJoe45 (rollback)

The result of the discussion was: Pictogram voting support Support


EveryDayJoe45 (talk · contributions · edit count)

I don't know if anybody will vote for me, haha, but I don't see why I shouldn't try. I think I've contriuted quite a lot in my realtively short time here, and I see no reason why I would stop anytime soon.

Votes

Pictogram voting support Support:Absolutely! You're a great contributor, and I don't really see you abusing your powers. I was actually considering nominating you soon anyway. Way to fall into the peer pressure by the way. (referring to your summary comment) :P —Triforce4Triforce 14(...) 01:28, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting support Support: Aye, good, seemingly tireless knowhowster. Had some trouble "getting into it", as they say, but it's been fine ever since. You're definitely deserving of this. --AuronKaizer! 01:31, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting support Support: Definitely deserving of rollback. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 01:54, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: Haha yep definitely a rocky start (sorry Triforce 14), but thanks for the supports. I didn't think it would turn out quite like this. --EveryDayJoe45 02:25, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: Bah don't worry about it. It was more of an overreaction on my part than anything :/—Triforce4Triforce 14(...) 02:28, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting support Support:'Sall been said already. Looking forward to welcoming you to the club, as it were.--Bek (talk) 04:38, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment:Aye, that makes four. Congratulations! —Triforce4Triforce 14(...) 05:35, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment:I don't have any problem with you becoming a rollbacker, but I'll warn you that if there was no reason so stop eding at those speeds I would be king of the metriod wiki. Metroidhunter32 13:23, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: First off, thanks Triforce. Second I don't uderstand the most rescent comment...--EveryDayJoe45 14:49, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment:I'd made a huge amount of edits over on wikitroid when I was new, but eventually I just kinda ran out of things to do. Metroidhunter32 14:51, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: Ok --EveryDayJoe45 15:04, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Moblin slayer (administrator)

The result of the discussion was: Pictogram voting oppose Oppose


Moblin slayer (talk · contributions · edit count)

Here are a few reasons why: 1. I am a trusted member of this wikia.

2. I have made a lot of contributions in the main namespace.

3. I keep a cool head in discussions.

4. I am respectful and courteous towards all other users, and quickly apologize if I offend anyone.

--Moblin Slayer 20:38, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Votes

Pictogram voting neutral Neutral: I don't know...I agree with most of the things above...can't really shake it but for some reason I don't feel you're quite ready for this yet. Rollback is a cert but adminship...I don't know. --AuronKaizer(...Kaizer!) 21:39, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral: What he said. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 23:28, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment:Yeah...that's pretty much what I expected. --Moblin Slayer 02:56, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose:I think it could go either way.Seeing that he's all but disappeared...— Triforce 14(...) 17:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral: I have seen many great contributions from you for the good of the wiki MS, and I'm sure I speak for everyone when I say we greatly appreciate them. Still, we have several administrators already on the rolls and I'm unsure whether we need to add to the swelling ranks at this point in time. On the other hand however, of those several on the rolls as administrators, only a handful seem to be on much of the time, so it could indeed be helpful to have a new one that is going to be around more often than others and help those of us that are on here frequently to better manage the wiki and continue to build it. So I am going to say wait for a short while, and if I still see this same trend of just a handful of admins including myself manage the wiki, then I will gladly change my vote to support because we could indeed use the extra help from someone that's going to stick around. Hero of Time 87 14:46, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Peakprovince (rollback)

The result of the discussion was: Pictogram voting oppose Oppose


Peakprovince (talk · contributions · edit count)

I believe Rollback would be good for me because although it can be used to stop vandalism which is not a major problem. I would not use it for vandalism, because if I were here to vandalize I would have already done it. Alot of my work has been spreading Talk templates, and other needed things to other wiki's that have a lack of that. Many times the already existing Templates created by other people are inacurate or have something wrong with them. I do not have obsesive compulsive disorder even though I usually always spellcheck all of my work and/or conversations. I have excellent grammar capabilities, also if you want to see proof of me spreading talk templates and something or other talk to Bek The Conqueror. My main edits are not as many as most the reason for this is because I go to Microsoft word type my edit, spellcheck, grammar check and add any words that do not exist in my dictionary. Most of my edits are very extensive and I usually do not just post it.I am writing a fan-fic on Zelda Fanon. I welcome, and help many new members, and always try to explain as clearly as possible questions that they ask, or tell them someone that can awnser their questions (almost always AK or Richard. Thank you for your careful consideration.

I will except all comments positive and negative with gratitude. Thank you for all of your carefull considerations :)- Peakprovince

Votes

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose You're doing great, but one month is a bit too early in my opinion. Hey, that's just me though. By the way, your first sentence is not a complete idea :) Haven't seen anything new from him since he requested. — Triforce 14(...) 22:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment No it isn't. But thank you for your opinion :) Peakprovince 22:14, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment The "because" and "although" don't take a good combination. I suggest taking one out or changing "which" to "it". Oh, by complete idea I meant a complete sentence not like the idea wasn't clear. Just lookin' out for ya. — Triforce 14(...) 22:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral: Yep, you've really come around despite a "sketchy" entrance (you know what I mean :P) and come to embrace the community spirit and try to help out. That's great. Despite that, it's still too early for you to to get your rollback badge (quick, somebody make those damn badges already!) but with some more months of mainspace edits, you can finally make it! Keep editin'. --AuronKaizer(...Kaizer!) 16:13, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment I'll probably run again once Flashpenny gets un-banned -
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral: A little longer. Μρ Κμιλ

PhantomGanonUsurper27 (rollback)

The result of the discussion was: Pictogram voting oppose Oppose


PhantomGanonUsurper27 (talk · contributions · edit count)

I've been on this wiki for much time now, and I am always playing my LoZ games, trying to get some new information for this wiki, because I want it to be a better place for all the LoZ fans, like me, without the intervention of vandals.

Votes

Pictogram voting support Support: Sure, you're a good editor, deservant of rollback. --AuronKaizer(...Kaizer!) 22:11, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose: I hate to do this, but I haven't really seen many edits from you, especially on the mainspace. Make good edits on the mainspace and I might change my mind though. :)Nothing at all since request. — Triforce 14(...) 22:23, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral: ...I'm so ashamed. I thought you were another user -.- I get confused sometimes, it's a problem I have. Anyway, Triforce 14 said it, pretty much; there haven't really been enough useful edits on your part to qualify for rollback. Sorry to get your hopes up v_v --AuronKaizer(...Kaizer!) 22:31, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral: Sorry, but I have to agree with Triforce 14; you haven't made a whole lot of edits in the mainspace. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 23:45, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: Yeah, pretty much what I expected. I'll try to get better, though. PGU27

Oni Dark Link (rollback)

The result of the discussion was: Pictogram voting oppose Oppose


you all know me. I've been around for a while (just checked my own history and it was October 29th when i made my first edit). I think its time I went for some Roll Back rights. I have an expansive knowledge of the series and have played every game considered cannon except the original four swords. I do edit here often providing information that people overlooked or just never noticed. I am active a lot and think I would make a good roll backer.

Votes

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose: You just haven't made enough mainspace edits yet. Most of your edits are talk, user, or on the temple of courage. Keep making good edits though and you'll get it eventually—Triforce4Triforce 14(...) 19:34, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose: I agree, you haven't made enough mainspace edits. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 23:20, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose: I just don't find you good enough of an editor for this distinguished honor. --AuronKaizer! 01:31, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: since it doesnt look like im going to get it, how many edits do you rekon i should have before i try again. 500, 1000? Oni Dark Link 21:08, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: It's more of quality over quantity. But in general, your mainspace edits should outweigh your talk and the ToC edits. Try to slow down a bit and check over your work for spelling and grammar mistakes too. —Triforce4Triforce 14(...) 21:41, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: well i do love to talk so out weighing seems hard but there i go again im unessarly talking. im going to stop now. Oni Dark Link 21:55, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: Excuse the "curtness" of my previous vote, but I didn't have the time to type it out correctly. To be fair, I think Triforce said it all. It's obvious that you love Zelda and try to edit as well as you can, but there's way too many talk edits and too few edits where it matters, you know, in the main namespace and images and all that. If you try to focus on those areas more, there may easily be a chance for you to become a rollback user in the future. Everybody can improve, right? So don't take this the wrong way or anything. --AuronKaizer! 00:39, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: dont worry i know exactly what you mean. i say where something is wrong on the talk page instead of actuly changing it. i will try and just change things in future and when the time is right i will go for roll back again but for now i am quite happy being just a user Oni Dark Link 11:10, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment:Is it ok to archive this now then?—Triforce4Triforce 14(...) 21:32, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: What's with the hurry? He doesn't even have four oppose votes yet... (or whatever rule we like to invent to make it appear as if we have a system:) --AuronKaizer! 10:53, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment:I dunno, we really need to come up with an official system though...—Triforce4Triforce 14(...) 11:30, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: i think it should be archived. i dont think im going to get the nessary amount of votes this time round and its already becoming quite a large section. Oni Dark Link 11:35, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Requests for demotion

Lord link

The result of the discussion was: Pictogram voting oppose Oppose


Misuse of admin powers. Promotion to adminship was not backed by any other users.

Votes

Pictogram voting comment Comment: Lord link asked me several weeks ago to monitor his work and see if my support would be warranted. I did so, and agreed to keep that promise as he'd already had his request on here previously. But I refuse to be drug into this AK and Murch, and despite how much you may disagree with me philiosophically, you will not be trying to axe me over a simple misunderstanding. Leave me out of it, because I could say several offenses against both of you. So let's not go there. Hero of Time 87 04:48, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: Okay, fine. Worm your way out of it this time. Just remember, there are no second chances.
Pictogram voting support Support: Jesus, fantastically laughable. Sorry, but I doubt you'll ever qualify anyway. You do deserve to keep your rollback rights though.--AuronKaizerKennedy! 05:18, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: I don't have to "worm my way out" of anything. I did nothing wrong. We as admins are allowed to grant rights to those who have gone through the process. That was the case. What they do with their rights though is not up to me but them. So don't even start trying to drag me into the picture. I shall also keep this in mind about the two of you in the future, AK and Murch. While I still respect your work on the wiki, your ill-fated attempt to have me de-admined has cost both of your standings in my book, not that it much matters. But I will keep this showing of true colors in mind in the future though. Hero of Time 87 05:31, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose:
[[File:{{{image}}}|50px]]
[[User:{{{name}}}|{{{name}}}]] – {{{sig}}}
[[User talk:{{{name}}}|TALK]]
While I did deem you fit for admin powers Lord link, banning another admin and trying to take away his powers is not exactly the first thing I would elect to do with them. However, I have had several complaints about AK's behavior, and a few about Murch's as well. I am a firm believer in discussion though, and that we can resolve our differences by talking and being reasonable. I could think of several reasons to remove AK or Murch from their own positions of power (and there are plenty of people that would agree with it), yet I respect their work on the wiki. I would hope they would show the same courtesy to others, but that is for them to decide. Personally, I see no reason to remove your rights, other than to warn you not to overstep them again. I would hope thats fair enough. You've done some good work and you're also a bureacrat on another zelda-related wiki, both good qualities for an admin. You went through the formal process and were patient to await the time when you could gain support. I believe a formal warning is in order for a first-time deal. Just be forewarned about the boundaries of the rights though.

As for you AK, remember what I said above, and you as well Murch. Treating people with respect is the only way we work here, so I would suggest you both start practicing it.

Pictogram voting comment Comment: Like I give a damn about your respect anyway...you're a troublemaker and a liar. However, we should all just let it go and wait for your next screw-up.
Pictogram voting comment Comment: That little outburst is exactly what you could be thrown out for, AK; conduct unbecoming of an admin. You don't seem to grip that reality, but it's true. You are the troublemaker and the liar here, and I have a lot of people that would agree with me. You've screwed up on several occasions, and this is one of them. Malicious mischief (the illegitimate vote), wrongful attempted removal of rights of a fellow admin, poor attitude toward users in general, troublemaking, the list goes on. So you better (forgive the phrase) "damn well" care about my respect and the respect of everyone else, because that's the main reason you've not been confronted with removal up to this point. Whether or not you realize it, you've made several more enemies than friends, and you make it impossible for even me to reach out to you in good faith. You've irked a lot of people with your poor attitude, and I'm saying for your own good to start being a little nicer to people unless you want to lose your own admin rights some day for legitimate reasons. Even a simple apology to those you've irked or a tone-down of some of the ruder comments I've seen you use toward them or myself would be a vast improvement of your standing with the majority of users on the wiki. It all boils down to respect as I said before; If you want to be respected, you must show respect in return. If you don't do that, you're setting yourself up for humiliating failure down the road. Hero of Time 87 11:46, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: Okay, you've made your point. What illegitimate vote are you referring to though? If it is my vote of no-confidence in you that is illegitimate, wouldn't that apply to these other two as well? And since you nominated them in the first place, isn't it conflict-of-interest to vote on your own nomination? --AuronKaizerKennedy! 12:48, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: No, I refer to the illegitimate vote on removing theories in a discreet manner and reversing the effects of it after the fact. And I only nominated Lord link, and did nothing else. So no, this is not a "conflict of interest," merely a mentioning of how you could better your standing with all of us with a little cooperation on your part. We don't want to dislike you AK, you just make it really hard to like you. I'm suggesting ways you could make it easier. Hero of Time 87 13:33, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support: Lord link only has enough good work to be a rollback righter. Hero of Time, this was one of your dumber decisions, first off, lord link hasn't edited enough, and 1 week wont cut it for even rollback rights, let alone adminship, and Lord link mostly edits clubs still, he used to ONLY edit clubs, and once in awhile add {{stub}} to the end of an article. I still don't think he deserves admin rights, and barely think he deserves rollback rights. Guru-Guru Traveling Musician With Odd Instruments 14:36, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment: Actually Guru-Guru, I'm afraid we'll have to agree to disagree there, for I do not see it as dumb. I merely kept a promise I made to review his request at a later date and felt he does have experience necessary for an admin seeing as he is a bureaucrat on the zelda-fanon wiki. So I would advise you not to insult me or anyone else in future. Hero of Time 87 15:17, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: Okay, so I've gotten over my hissy fit, had my coffee, and now I feel great. I got angry, and I sort of regret it, but then again, I don't. I shall rephrase my words to more properly evoke my original statement; Lord link did give someone admin without any forewarning, which I strongly advised him not to do again. He has shown to be overly reckless with his newfound power, so as far as you deserving this, I do not agree with Hero of Time 87's decision. We can't just give admin rights to every new prominent user on the block. No hard feelings against you Lord link, but I do not think you qualify or have shown yourself worthy of your newfound position. I still think it was extremely poor judgment from Hero of Time 87's side not to tell us about this "review" thing. I know that so many of you editors know this guy and are expected to show some kind of bias, but look into your heart, and you will that Lord link is not admin material. --AuronKaizerKennedy! 22:59, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment:hey UP asked to be B-crat so he kinda presserd me into doing this so take that up with him im sorry really ive been here for two months i think im ready you (AK) murch UP (kinda) and HoT are the onley active admins and i know this sounds like im copying HoT but you guys cant be here all the time im on here every day (for the most part) and i know how to use Admin abilites im soory we got on the wrong foot plus i know how to do every thing here on wikia so i hope you keep me i promise will follow the rules --Lord Link
Pictogram voting comment Comment: Whoa, hold the phone! He "pressured" you? What do you mean? --AuronKaizerKennedy! 01:42, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: hes like "you cant be B-crat if im not one" so i guss that counts right? plese give me anther chance but if you want to demote me but who has the most community experiace soory AK but becase of your outbursts dont think youll be welcome in a club same with murch UP is oppsed to clubs so ya-- Lord Link
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose: This dude is a good well... dude. I haven't seen any misuse of admin powers to and if he has one more chance I think he will greatly help this wiki--Power Wisdom Courage and Time
Pictogram voting comment Comment: Dude, have you totally missed something here? Editors aren't supposed to be "threatened" into giving someone admin powers. And I don't care much about getting into your silly clubs. I don't think turning Zeldapedia into MySpace is helping anyone. --AuronKaizerKennedy! 02:20, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose:He really has contributed pretty nicely to this wiki, and although he may have misused his powers, everyone makes mistakes. Besides, he didn't do anything irreversible, and I believe that the good he has done for this wiki outways two reversible mistakes. In addition, his actions were influenced by a conversation on the shoutbox (I won't mention any names to protect the privacy of those users involved) about how AK's behavior was "unfit for an admin" as he had been going to talk pages and answering questions/comments in a sarcastic manner (and not the joking kind of sarcasm; the make you feel like an idiot kind.) And almost everyone there were in agreement with those statements.--Moblin slayer 02:26, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: Well, nice to know my conspiracy theories aren't incorrect. I'd like it if you pointed out what you're referring to though, so you actually have a case. Anyways, looks like he's got too many friends to lose this one, so I guess we really could drop it. Gotta love democracy, eh? --AuronKaizerKennedy! 02:31, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment:I'm not doing this because I am LL's friend. I am doing this because I believe he deserves to be an admin. And AK, I have several people who witnessed/were involved in the conversation, such as LL, HoT87, and HoW. It was right b4 you were banned, so if you can find it, you've got your evidence. I am sorry all of this had to happen. And Ak, some of your comments were meanspirited, though I guess since I'm not an admin/rollback my word means nothing. I am just saying that this is not entirely LL's fault. He already wasn't exactly on good terms w/ you, and several other people fueled the fire.--Moblin slayer 02:40, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose: Hey, I'm not saying that they weren't mean-spirited. Wouldn't it make you angry if somebody banned you without warning with admin powers they'd just have gotten. Anyway, I've decided to place my trust in HoT87's decision and let you keep the admin powers, Lord link.
Pictogram voting support Support: I feel like I should vote this way.
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose: ok dont hate me for this but i feel that this demotion is part of a "power struggle"(ok well... not exactly but you get the picture)

i personaly think that this is all so pointless toon

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose Really, I think the whole thing is stupid. NONE of what happened was LL's fault, this was between me, Griff, and Relyt for the most part. I don't see why he should be punished for doing something, however stupid, while caught up in our idiotic fights. The whole thing is over, I don't see why you guys need to demote him now. midnaslave 16:57, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment I don't see why we're getting after HoT for promoting him to admin/SySop (not sure specifically) BEFORE any of this happened. He obviously wouldn't know this would come to pass. midnaslave 17:03, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting support Support:like I said, no hard feelings, its just that youve blocked several accounts that did not deserve to be blocked. Ive been watching these users and have done none of the things you claimed they did.Ganondorf 00:30, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose:While I do agree, LL has been doing a good job. I know I haven't been on in a while, but Hero is the first guy I met here, so I'm going to trust in his choices. --Mr kmil 22:13, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Hero Of Wisdom

The result of the discussion was: Pictogram voting oppose Oppose


Was promoted for no reason what-so-ever.

Votes

Pictogram voting support Support: This is what happens when you let some people go crazy. This could be the worst move in the history of...moves. I'll let you keep your rollback rights though, as I was planning to nominate you anyway. No offense, but due to past indiscretions you do not qualify for actual admin rights anytime soon. You've really worked your way on my good side though, keep it up! --AuronKaizerKennedy! 05:18, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: With all due respect AK, you're not the only one involved in the giving of rights to others either. No one has to get on anyone's "good side" to earn rights, it's through merit. I don't think it's for you to decide alone whether or not any one person is worthy of rights. If they have gone through the process and they have demonstrated good work, they are deserving based on merit, not solely if they are on your good side. So let us have no more of the favoritism here. Hero of Time 87 05:35, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: That's the problem - there is little other merit. The point I tried to make is that Hero of Wisdom had a very bad attitude but has gotten over that. --AuronKaizerKennedy! 08:23, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: The same could be said for you though AK, as far as a "very bad attitude" goes. And there are several people that would agree with that, whether you realize it or not. So I suggest you start looking at things in broader perspective, because behavior I've seen coming out of you for quite some time has been downright disrespectful, rude, and unbecoming of an admin. That is something every admin should have is respect for others and an overall friendly attitude, and I'm sorry to say I haven't seen either of those out of you to date. None of us are perfect by any means, but don't be so quick to point fingers either. "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone." Hero of Time 87 11:52, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
"Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" is a terrible proverb. It implies that no-one is allowed to punish anyone for anything. JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 12:05, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: Regardless, it means we are all capable of mistakes. No one is perfect Vimescarrot; not me, not you, not AK, not anyone. We should not be so quick to point fingers at someone else for something if we ourselves are guilty of the same offense. Hero of Time 87 12:14, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: If you haven't seen "respect for others" (respect for you, however, is another matter) or "an overall friendly attitude" on my part, you haven't been looking. I welcome and greet users, and while I admit that I am not the most tolerant with people joking about this place, I try my best. People come to me and ask for some opinions and I give it to them. Whether or not you may agree with them is your problem. For the entirety of my stay here, I've seen behaviour from your side that is against many principles that I've followed all my life, but I'm not here to tell you about that. In any case, I advise that you be careful to who and when you give admin rights away like candy in the future. My belief is fully in the system of discussion on who shall be given admin rights, which is why I suggest (and wrongfully believed it to be, silly me for expecting some sort of system here) that no admin should simply grant a user admin rights. Nor should they be able to change another staffers rank without discussion. This is merely a suggestion on how to do it in a way that will not create situations like this in the future. We have an extremely flawed system here, as it comes to rules, as I've seen nothing anywhere about this. Very well. --AuronKaizerKennedy! 12:48, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support: Okay, hero of Wisdom never even deserved rollback rights in the first place. He has the biggest ban record on Zeldapedia, why he isn't banned is a question to me, he only edits clubs, he calls himself a punker as an excuse to treat everybody here like a pile of shit, and not only that, he gets away with it. All that happens is "UP, HOW cussed in shoutbox!". I am not HOW's maid. He also thinks his name is Relyt. IF HE WANTED A NAME LIKE THAT HE COULD'VE CHOSEN IT, DON'T MAKE EVERYBODY CALL YOU WHO YOU AREN'T! Anyways, this user never deserved rollback rights, and will never deserve admin rights, all he is is a jerk who has to get his way... Guru-Guru Traveling Musician With Odd Instruments 14:40, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment: In reply to Hero of Time 87's first comment: It was you alone that gave Lord link and HOW adminship, so don't be giving AK grief about that. You nominated both of them, nobody backed you, so you still wanted to get your way. This is what I hate about some people. They HAVE to get their way or everyone gets hurt, or just get mad. Dude, stop thinking you are the mature one, you caused this problem. Guru-Guru Traveling Musician With Odd Instruments 14:44, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment: In reply to Guru-Guru, I did no such thing. I did give Lord link rights, yes, but by no means did I give HOW any. That I believe was done by someone other than myself, so quit accusing me of things I did not do. And you are entirely incorrect about "getting my way," because that was not the case at all. This was a merit-based request that I had promised to review and give my judgment at a later date, so don't spout off about things you don't even know about Guru-Guru. I caused no problem, I merely granted a request that was made of me. So I would ask you to refrain from the personal affrontations. I have been more than mature about this, and I'm afraid your immaturity itself is showing in that you are making false accusations against me, and I will simply say stop it. I have received numerous complaints concerning the behaviors of select admins, and cases like this only confirm their complaints to me. If anyone was trying to "get their way," it was you, AK and Murch trying to slip the theory vote in under the table and change the effect of the vote after the fact. That deception alone is grounds for dismissal, and you all three tried to end it quietly and quickly saying "your views are immaterial," but when others caught wind of it they voted it down quickly. So don't even go there with me about "getting your way," because that was a blatant case of the three of you banding together to try to introduce sweeping changes to the wiki without many others knowing about it. Hero of Time 87 15:21, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment:Uber, I told them to call me Relyt. I asked them if they would. They never had to call me Relyt. And most of still don't.Seth The Plumber 20:38, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment:yes um i made relyt admin first rollback thn sysop kill me over relyt's demotion sorry i ever did so so dont't get mad at HoT87 clear good - Lord Link
Pictogram voting support Support: While I think Uber is going a bit overboard on the language, I agree. He needs to be taken off, mainly for the reasons above. --Mr kmil 22:16, 29 December 2008 (UTC)