Gaming
 

Zeldapedia:Featured articles

from Zeldapedia, the Legend of Zelda wiki

Archives
Archives

1 2 3 4

Featured articles of Zeldapedia are articles that represent the best articles Zeldapedia has to offer. For articles to be featured on the Main Page, see /Queue. For previously featured articles, see Zeldapedia:Previous featured articles.

Contents

Criteria

So just what makes a featured article? Well, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must...

  1. ...be well written and detailed
  2. ...be unbiased and have a neutral point of view
  3. ...be factual and not incorporate theory presented as fact
  4. ...be properly sourced if controversial information is entered into it
  5. ...not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. cleanup, expand, etc.)
  6. ...follow the Manual of Style and the Layout Guide
  7. ...have a succinct proper lead that can be used for the front page featured box
  8. ...have a complete, detailed biography if it is a character article
  9. ...not be the subject of any ongoing edit wars

See here for a list of current featured articles on Zeldapedia. For more information on what makes a featured article, see Wikipedia:Wikipedia's treatise on featured articles.

How to nominate an article

  1. First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above. Also, add the nomination template to the top of the article you nominate.
  2. Certain users may object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they must then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources). If no reason is supplied, their vote will not be counted until they do this.
  3. Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
  4. The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue.

How to vote

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes. Edit and fix these if you have time.
  2. Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination. (If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.)
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
  4. Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (or the article has 5 supports and no objections after at least a week), the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "featured article".
Eventually, the next article in the queue will be highlighted on the main page as featured, marked with the
This is a featured article
template and removed from the list of nominations.

Featured article nominations

South of the Village

Now that's one freakin' good article.—Triforce 14 11:55, October 2, 2009 (UTC)

Support

  1. Its a pretty good article. --EveryDayJoe45 (talk) 22:43, October 2, 2009 (UTC)
  2. It's a good article, yes it's minor in the series, but it's still high quality.-- C2 / CC 22:46, October 2, 2009 (UTC)
  3. Ride the King's Highway, baby. --AuronKaizer! 01:17, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
  4. Nice bro-sizzle. --Z31T)6311 07:35, November 27, 2009 (UTC), your man of the world.
  5. Finally made up my mind on this one. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 17:55, December 15, 2009 (UTC)

Objection

  1. good yes, complete yes but I just don’t think we should have it as a featured article in comparison to some of the others we have. Oni Dark Link 18:45, October 2, 2009 (UTC)
  2. I don't see how this is well-written, in all honesty. All major-minor article arguments aside, there are plenty of other articles written the same, that look the same. —Baltro [ talk · edits ] 21:51, October 7, 2009 (UTC)

Comments

I honestly don't know what to think about this one...on the one hand, it was clearly written well. But I just don't really see it as FA material, if you know what I mean. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 18:53, October 2, 2009 (UTC)

No, I don't really see why it isn't featured article material?—Triforce 14 22:40, October 2, 2009 (UTC)
He's saying because its such a minor thing in the series. --EveryDayJoe45 (talk) 22:43, October 2, 2009 (UTC)
There's no rule though saying featured articles have to be important parts of the series. I thought this was based purely off quality?—Triforce 14 22:48, October 2, 2009 (UTC)
Yeah But a lot of people prefer to see major articles I'm sure. --EveryDayJoe45 (talk) 22:55, October 2, 2009 (UTC)
I nominate major ones, but I'm not against these smaller, well written ones.-- C2 / CC 22:57, October 2, 2009 (UTC)
No, it's not just that it's minor...I don't know, I just don't see it. I can't really describe what I'm feeling here. I won't oppose though. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 22:57, October 2, 2009 (UTC)

bigger ones do look better on the main page, that should also be a factor since featured articles are the examples of the site Oni Dark Link 22:59, October 2, 2009 (UTC)

I think your oppose is a bit unfounded in it's reasoning. Good article=why not?....to me at least.-- C2 / CC 01:23, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
Hes doesn't know what that means. --EveryDayJoe45 (talk) 01:26, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
Umm... how 'bout "I think the reason for your oppose, isn't very good." That's Layman's terms too.-- C2 / CC 01:31, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
He usually uses the question everything tactic. And I was obviously being sarcastic. --EveryDayJoe45 (talk) 01:34, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
Hah, perhaps it wasn't that obvious. --AuronKaizer! 01:50, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
Unless you were being sarcastic there....-- C2 / CC 01:52, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
Who can tell these days? --AuronKaizer! 01:54, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
Someone who's sarcastic, and doesn't even relize it.-- C2 / CC 01:56, October 7, 2009 (UTC)

Sarcasm can be confusing with out hearin the tone of voices (or am i just being sarcastic?). Oni Dark Link 20:26, October 7, 2009 (UTC)

@Baltro:That's because we try to keep all articles similar. We're supposed to be uniform, its better than... well... Zelda Wiki.-- C2 / CC 22:31, October 8, 2009 (UTC)

I think his point is that there are plenty of other articles that are of the same quality and look more or less the same, i.e. why was this one singled out of all things? Not necessarily agreeing or disagreeing with this, but I think that's what he meant. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 22:43, October 8, 2009 (UTC)
I see that now, wished he had just said that they had similar quality but hey, I can understand his point of view now.-- C2 / CC 22:45, October 8, 2009 (UTC)

Well in that can also argue that any article we feature has other articles just as good as it and shouldn't be featured... I'm really kind of sorry I even suggested this, and it's not that I'm just defending what I put up, I just wish you would vote on the article rather than everything else unrelated to it. Even opposing it just because you don't like it is better.—Triforce 14 01:36, October 9, 2009 (UTC)

I just don't think its long enough but other then that know objections.--Ironknuckle1 (talk) 20:16, October 13, 2009 (UTC)

I think we can call this an oppose.-- C2 / CC 16:29, December 12, 2009 (UTC)

Mask

I've professionalized this article and made it cleaned up. I thinks it's better now. Please edit, make it better, etc. Thankyou, --⽩㤖㒾 - 㑻 06:45, December 12, 2009 (UTC), your man of the world.

Support

  1. Kind of a lame pick for a featured article, but there's nothing wrong with the article, as such. --AuronKaizer! 11:17, December 12, 2009 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. This page is a disambig with more words. Pass. --EveryDayJoe45 (talk) 15:46, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
  2. I just don't see this as FA material for the some reason as Joe. Jedimasterlink (talk) 02:01, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
  3. Nothing wrong with it, but eh..... not awhole lot of content for featured page.-- C2 / CC 02:04, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
  4. What they said. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 17:55, December 15, 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Gah. Lame? ... That's cold. Well I should probably keep working on it, nothing wrong about making an article better right? --⽩㤖㒾 - 㑻 15:41, December 12, 2009 (UTC)

What I mean is, it's a glorified list that for some reason doesn't work as a disambiguation page. --AuronKaizer! 15:43, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
Ah, yes, I'll work on it. --⽩㤖㒾 - 㑻 15:54, December 12, 2009 (UTC), your man of the world.
Now it's a tad more interesting. --⽩㤖㒾 - 㑻 16:12, December 12, 2009 (UTC), your man of the world.
Farfetch'd™ theories isn't what I had in mind when I said that. --AuronKaizer! 16:14, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
That was a tad more innapropriate at best. --EveryDayJoe45 (talk) 16:15, December 12, 2009 (UTC)

Should we just delete the lists of masks? --⽩㤖㒾 - 㑻 16:27, December 12, 2009 (UTC), your man of the world.

Happy Mask Salesman

Meets the criteria, and is a generally good article. It has some theory, but it is not the majority of the article.-- C2 / CC 16:21, December 12, 2009 (UTC)

Support

  1. Aww, I was going to do that. The article is my "baby" and all that. But oh well, I guess it's as good as it's going to get right now. --AuronKaizer! 16:24, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
  2. This is a great article. Jedimasterlink (talk) 02:01, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
  3. Good Article. Mr kmil File:Spin Attack (A Link to the Past).gif 17:06, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
  4. All opposition must be eradicated. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 17:55, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
  5. Definately, one of my favorite wikis. Some cool theory and great insight!!--The Gerudo Guy (talk) 21:26, December 15, 2009 (UTC)The Gerudo Guy I REALLY NEED MY TALK BUBBLE!!!
  6. Def'nately this one. --⽩㤖㒾 - 㑻 02:31, December 18, 2009 (UTC), your man of the world.

Oppose

Comments

Retrieved from "http://zelda.wikia.com/wiki/Zeldapedia:Featured_articles"