FANDOM


  • Shouldn't Enemies be a sub-category of Races?---- Herbswell
  • I disagree. Although a few enemies do qualify as a race the majority of them do not. I.M.O to be qualified as a race you need to

1. Be living

2. Have or be capable of having an advanced level of intelligence (enough to reason and to talk).

3. To be physically different from other races to be qualified as there own race.

4. And to have there own distinct society.

While a few enemies such as the Deku and Skull Kids have the qualities, most of the common L.O.Z enemies such as Octoroks, Armos, and ChuChus have very few, if any of these qualities. I.M.O we need to have Enemies and races as there own separate categories.----ShutUpNavi 19:47, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

  • You can have enemies that are intelligent (races) or not, and you can also have races that are friendly (allies) or unfriendly (enemies). Something can belong to both groups, but neither is dependent on the other. --KikisKin 20:06, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
  • O.K I realize it’s been almost a year since anyone responded to this question (and a LOT has changed on the Wiki since then) but the reply above is the reason we need to have Enemies and races as there own separate categories. Bosses can be characters, and characters can be bosses, but neither is a subcategory of one another because most of characters aren’t bosses and vice versa. Same thing with the Races/Enemies thing. I am going to change this right now.--ShutUpNavi 20:48, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Game-specific Edit

GasMaskPsychoHatGuy
AuronKaizer - "Daddy love Froggy. Froggy love daddy? *squeak-squeak*"
TALK - THE LIST - GAMES - PIT OF RECKONING - SANDBOX - WALRUS GUMBOOT
Y'know, I was browsing around and noticed some disagreements about how to categorize these. How about game-specific race categories? Eh? Ya feel me? I wonder why nobody brought it up before.
Zant
Ccbermanzzpedia – I am here to serve..... and to have others serve me........
TALK – 12:29, October 4, 2009 (UTC) Timeline My edits ?x?
I feel you.
General Onox
EveryDayJoe45 – "You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time."--Abraham Lincoln
TALK
I say go ahead and do it. This would help make it more neat and it is also consistent with how we categorize other things. So yeah. I think this is a very good idea.
GasMaskPsychoHatGuy
AuronKaizer - "Flyman! Able to climb tall air vents in a thousand tiny fly steps! Able to do whatever a fly can! ...Except fly... or lay eggs... or vomit acid on his food, and stuff."
TALK - THE LIST - GAMES - PIT OF RECKONING - SANDBOX - WALRUS GUMBOOT 19:27, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
Wow, I posted that over a year ago...anyway, I'll get to it soon, if somebody doesn't beat me to it.

Glitch in the Page or Something Edit

Certain races like Zuna, Tokay, and Dog don't appear on this list. From what I can tell the reason is that this page automatically generates a list of categories which are themselves part of the races category. Since the Zuna for example have no individuals with pages, no one has made a category, and the race exists only as the straight up Zuna page. I propose that anything that is considered a race be given a category like all the other races have. In a few cases like the Zuna the only entry would be the page for the race in general, but it would allow all races to appear on this page. Normally categories would of course not be made for single/few pages like this, but given the way this Races Category Page handles things it would make navigation easier, which is the point of making categories anyway.--FierceDeku 08:58, November 16, 2011 (UTC)