why did the picture change for this is it ok or not
The picture changed from what it originally was for link
- If you're talking about Link on the main page, then yeah, we updated it with Link from Skyward Sword. And yes, it is ok. The™ 23:48, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
I just don't like the idea. Seems too gimmicky and potentially a difficult category for which to determine what exactly makes a character a "villain". Besides which, the list of final bosses lists a majority of these. --AuronKaizer! 20:45, July 11, 2011 (UTC)
- It'd be good to have in the case of characters like Zant and the Twinrova who are major villains but not actually final bosses, but as AK said it would be difficult to draw a line on what makes someone a villain. Do they have to show up multiple times? Talk? We could try to decide villains on a case by case basis, though that might be messy. On the other hand, I feel like most people's opinions on which villains are significant will probably be so close together that we could just go down the list of games and choose who we wanted to include without much trouble. If we can get over the difficultly of defining them, a villains category could work in my opinion.--FierceDeku 21:56, July 11, 2011 (UTC)
Proposal: Addition of Guide Characters
I think that a recurring type of character could be called and categorized as a Guide Character. for example, Navi, Tatl, Midna, Fi, etc. All these characters accompany and help Link on his quest. Thoughts?
OK. So, thats a no because it is hard to categorize them? Just making sure thats what "Above Section" is referring to.